United States Ex Rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, District Judge.
The qui tam plaintiff and defendant have negotiated a settlement and submitted a final order dismissing this action. The United States of America takes the position that the qui tam action cannot be dismissed without its consent and the Attorney General has sought to impose or include certain conditions in the terms of the settlement which the qui tam plaintiff and defendant find objectionable. (Court File No. 372). The question to be resolved is whether the qui tam plaintiff and the defendant may negotiate a settlement and agree to have this action dismissed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Harry D. HirschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Minotti v. LensinkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States ex rel. Laughlin v. EicherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Searcy v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Fender v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Hullinger v. Hercules, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.