Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Fender v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 6, 2000No. 98-G-0899-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GUIN, District Judge.

The case presently before the court falls within the parameters of the False Claims Act [hereinafter FCA], 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., designed by Congress to “... encourage private citizens to help the executive branch deter and redress violations of federal law.” Evan Carminker, The Constitutionality of Qui Tam Actions, 99 Yale L.J. 341, 344 (1989). Under the FCA, any person who knowingly submits a false claim to the government is liable to the United States [hereinafter the Government] 1 for a civil penalty and damages. The Act provides that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States of America, Ex Rel., Max Killingsworth v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. County of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Littlewood v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. United States Ex Rel. Dimartino v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  3. United States Ex Rel. Jones v. Westwind Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. United States of America ex rel v. Aerocare Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API