Legal Opinion

Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 8, 1995No. 93-771CPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, STINSON, LYONS & BUSTAMANTE, P.A., is a law firm (“plaintiff’ or “Stinson”) alleging it is due money damages from the United States (“defendant” or “government”) under certain qui tam1 provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(5) and (d)(1) (1988 & Supp. V 1993). Specifically, pursuant to the foregoing provisions, plaintiff is seeking to recover a statutory share of the government’s proceeds of $27 million derived from a settle*475ment with the qui tam defendant, where the government elected not to intervene in plaintiffs case…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44,090 Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Moore v. Public Defenders OfficeUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API