Legal Opinion
Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2005No. 01-1510PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
This is a qui tam action,2 filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729. David E. Ridenour, Jeffrey B. Peters, and Mark Graf (Relators) contend Appellees, security providers3 at Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant (Rocky Flats), conspired to present for payment, knowingly presented, and were paid for, false claims for deficient, defective, or non-existent security measures, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3). After de-*929dining to intervene, the Government filed a motion to dismiss the action, which the district court granted. United States…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kevin G. Kelly v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Hoyte v. American National Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. UCB, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.