Legal Opinion

Page v. Mancuso

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 4, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1606PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Dale Page filed the instant amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that both the District of Columbia and Officer Ashley Mancuso of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department violated his constitutional rights. Specifically, Plaintiff contends that (1) Officer Mancuso violated the Fourth Amendment when she arrested him unlawfully (Count I); (2) the District of Columbia was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiffs over-detention and strip search in violation of his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Singh v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Sherrod v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Ross v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Brokenborough v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Tyson v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API