Legal Opinion

Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 20, 1967No. 179, Docket 30584PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge:

In this case Judge Rosling, in the Eastern District of New York, on a voluminous record and after a 19-day trial, held what we shall call the Fenske patent on a “Data Plotting and Indicating Device” invalid and not infringed by the accused devices of Kollsman Instrument Corporation. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., the as-signee of United States Patent No. 2,-859,659, appeals. Judge Rosling’s lengthy and reasoned opinion is reported at 149 U.S.P.Q. 168.

In the early 1950’s it had become apparent that space age velocities of attacking or defending aircraft and the possibility of a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Tights, Inc. v. Acme-Mccrary Corporation, and Orin R. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. National Union Fire Insurance v. Siliconix Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
  3. La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. Gilbert Shaw and Polymers, Inc. v. E. B. & A. C. Whiting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API