Legal Opinion
Ponce v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 13, 2018No. C080680PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRenner, J.
*255Plaintiffs and appellants Antonio and Imelda Aranda and their son-in-law, Heriberto Ponce, (together, Ponce and Aranda) appeal from the trial court's entry of a judgment of dismissal following an order imposing both terminating and monetary sanctions against them and their attorneys under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7.1 The trial court found that Ponce and Aranda's complaint was presented primarily for an improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation. ( § 128.7, subd. (b)(1).)
On appeal, Ponce and Aranda argue that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee Edward Warren v. Douglas GuelkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Wilbert J. Sheets, Cross-Appellant v. Yamaha Motors Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Co. Ltd. Of Iwata, Japan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate v. Herzog, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Kumar v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Silva v. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Thompson v. Casas CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020