Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1900No. L.A. No. 758PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

The suit was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed to the plaintiff by the defendant Johnson May 17, 1893, for three hundred dollars, etc. The defendant corporation and the defendant Baldwin filed cross-complaints to foreclose a subsequent mortgage on the same premises executed by the defendants Johnson to the former, and claimed by the latter to have been assigned to him. The mortgagors made default. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the foreclosure of his mortgage; and in favor of the defendant corporation for the foreclosure of the subsequent mortgage. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Main v. CasserlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Kelly v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. SlyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Berry v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. The Gladium Co., Inc. v. ThatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Luitwieler v. Luitwieler Pumping Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API