Legal Opinion

Rooz v. Kimmel

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1997No. A071398PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

In this case we must determine whether a hold harmless agreement absolved North American Title Company (North American) of liability for negligence when North American failed to record a deed of trust in a timely fashion. We conclude the trial court correctly found the hold harmless agreement protected North American. Consequently, we affirm the defense judgment as to North American. However, we also conclude the trial court erred in calculating the amount of damages plaintiff is entitled to recover from another defendant. Consequently, we modify the judgment to permit…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  2. Reliance National Indemnity Co. v. General Star Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Queen Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. TCB Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. City of Bell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API