Legal Opinion
Roth v. Keene
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1967No. Civ. 31262PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for personal injuries.
Plaintiff instituted this action against several defendants. A motion by Keene doing business as Silverlake Termite Control for a directed verdict was denied. A 10-to-2 jury verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff against Keene and against Donald Gurwell, doing business as A-l Fumigating Company, and against plaintiff in favor of defendant, Beller. Judgment on the verdict was entered March 31, 1966. Keene filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative, for a new…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grand v. GriesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Perfection Paint Products v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Berry v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- MacGregor v. KawaokaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Mann v. AndrusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Votaw Precision Tool Co. v. Air CanadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Walker v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. TennesseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Poag v. WinstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.