Legal Opinion

In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of Ellis

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1974No. 5044PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

As one of the very few and unique exceptions to the general rule that one not licensed to practice law before this Court is absolutely forbidden to engage in legal practice within this State, we held in In Re Ellis, 53 Haw. 23, 31, 487 P.2d 286, 291 (1971), cert. den., 405 U.S. 1075 (1972), that Mr. William S. Ellis, Jr., as trustee for the creditors and stockholders of Kula Development Corporation, a dissolved Hawaii corporation, might continue to render services of a legal nature to the dissolved corporation, providing that a determination of imperative financial necessity therefor be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Harada v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. MDG Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. MDG Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Oahu Plumbing & Sheet Metal, Ltd. v. Kona Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rosa v. CWJ Contractors, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Allen v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wohlschlegel v. Uhlmann-Kihei, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API