Legal Opinion

Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1998No. 19103PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINSON, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellee Fought & Company (Fought) and the defendants/cross-claimants/cross-claim defendants-appellants/cross-claim defendants-appellees Steel Engineering and Erection, Inc., Continental Casualty Corporation (Continental), which is Steel’s surety, (collectively Steel) and Kiewit Pacific Company (Kiewit) prevailed in Supreme Court No. 19103, 1 which affirmed (1) the circuit court’s order granting (a) Steel’s motion for summary judgment against Kiewit and the defendant/cross-claim defendant/cross-claim defendant-appellant/cross-elaim defendant-appellee Department…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Chun v. Bd. of Trustees of ERSHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Chun v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API