Legal Opinion

MDG Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Investments, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1969No. 4818PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MARUMOTO, J.

The parties presently concerned with this appeal are the trustees in dissolution of Diversified Investments, Inc., as appellants, and MDG Supply, Inc., as appellee. Orig inally, Kula Development Corporation and William S. Ellis, Jr., had also joined as appellants. But they have withdrawn after considerably muddying the record.

Stripped of all immaterial matters, the ultimate question for decision on this appeal is the validity of the Amended Order Appointing Commissioners and Ordering Sale of Eeal Property, entered by the second circuit court on September 9,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirby v. RunalsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Blackwelder v. CrooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shuput v. LauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BarancoHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stauth v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API