Legal Opinion

Allen v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1977No. 5957PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KOBAYASHI, J.

The City and County of Honolulu (hereinafter the City) brings this appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting money damages to Grace Gunn and Robert Allen (hereinafter appellees). The trial court ruled that the City, by rezoning appellees’ property, was liable for costs incurred by the appellees in reliance on the zoning applicable to the property when they purchased it.

For reasons stated hereinafter, we reverse.

ISSUE

The central issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting damages for the development costs incurred by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hollywood Beach Hotel Co. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Denning v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Life of the Land v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
  3. Snake River Brewing Co. v. Town of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. County of Kauai v. Pacific Standard Life InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use CommissionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API