Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
Relying on Hedgepath v. Stanley Home Products, 265 S.C. 248, 217 S.E. (2d) 782 (1975), the circuit court dismissed Cecil Dove’s (“Dove”) appeal from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Commission for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having determined that Hedgepath must be overruled, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Cecil Dove was employed by Gold Kist, Inc., a Georgia corporation, in its mill located in Lexington, South Carolina. Dove sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment at the Gold Kist Lexington County mill. Gold Kist admitted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bank of Babylon v. QuirkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Riley v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Balcon, Inc. v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Bambrick v. BambrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Nix v. Mercury Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In Re the Care & Treatment of MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Farmer v. Monsanto Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.