Legal Opinion

Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. Altman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 3, 1996No. 24490PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice.

This appeal is from an order granting summary judgment in an action to recover under the terms of a surety bond issued pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 56-15-320. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Carl Altman d/b/a Altman Auto Sales (Altman) was a motor vehicle dealer. As part of the licensing requirements for motor vehicle dealers, Appellant Western Surety Company (Western) and Altman executed a surety bond in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars. See S.C.Code Ann.- § 56-15-320 (Supp.1995). During the effective term of this bond, Altman purchased several vehicles from Respondent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creech v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Gilstrap Ex Rel. Gilstrap v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Burdette Chrysler Dodge Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Lester v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Wade v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API