State v. Craft
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
Defendants have submitted separate briefs, but have raised the same three questions. The questions are not related to perti nent assignments of error and exceptions as required by North' Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure 28(b) (3).
Defendants first assign error to the consolidation of their trials and rely upon State v. Alford, 289 N.C. 372, 222 S.E. 2d 222 (1976). It is well settled that consolidation is in the discretion of the trial judge, and, in the absence of a showing that a joint trial has deprived a defendant of a fair trial, the exercise of the judge’s discretion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SchrimpsherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. JeffersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. DistanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.