Legal Opinion

State v. Alford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1976No. 4PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendants first challenge the constitutionality of North Carolina’s death penalty. Questions raised by this assignment of error have been considered and found to be without merit in State v. Armstrong, 287 N.C. 60, 212 S.E. 2d 894 (1975); State v. Vick, 287 N.C. 37, 213 S.E. 2d 335 (1975); State v. Lowery, 286 N.C. 698, 213 S.E. 2d 255 (1975); State v. Simmons, 286 N.C. 681, 213 S.E. 2d 280 (1975); State v. Stegmann, 286 N.C. 638, 213 S.E. 2d 262 (1975); State v. Woods, 286 N.C. 612, 213 S.E. 2d 214 (1975); State v. McLaughlin, 286 N.C. 597, 213 S.E. 2d 238 (1975); State v.…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API