Legal Opinion

State v. Distance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 2004No. COA03-165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Lester Distance (“Distance”) and Tremaine Langley (“Langley”) (collectively, “defendants”) appeal their convictions for robbery with a dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit robbery with a dan gerous weapon. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that defendants received a trial free of prejudicial error.

On 30 January 2002, defendants were indicted for robbery with a dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon. The trial court granted the State’s pretrial motion to join defendants’ trials. On 3 April 2002, Distance filed a motion to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. PaigeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. LyszajSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. LaFountainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API