Legal Opinion

Thresher v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1921No. Civ. No. 3104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant for the sum of $780.44 and plaintiff’s costs.

The complaint alleges three causes of action. One is for money had and received; one for a balance due on a mutual open and current account, and one for the recovery of an alleged overpayment of money upon the ground that it was obtained upon false and fraudulent representations. The findings are applicable to support the first cause of action, and the evidence sustains those findings which concern the first cause of action. It is true that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence, but,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank of California v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Holst v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Soderberg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. West Frankfort Bank & Trust Co. v. BarrettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Mitchell v. California-Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. County of Santa Cruz v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Peterson v. MatchinskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API