Legal Opinion

National Bank of California v. Miner

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1914No. L.A. No. 3211PublishedCited by 32 opinions

. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to foreclose its pledge of certain securities, collateral obligations of the defendant Miner, who was a depositor, client, and debtor of the plaintiff bank. As affecting the First National Bank of Los Angeles, defendant, cross-complainant and appellant herein, the plaintiff sought to recover $2,970 upon a cashier’s check drawn by defendant bank in favor of the plaintiff. The defense" of the defendant bank was of nonliability growing out of lack of consideration and of a mistake noninjurious to the plaintiff, which, therefore, appellant was entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Palace Hardware Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Thompson v. Sioux Falls National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Unger v. Travel Arrangements, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Hall-Mark Electronics Corp. v. Sims (In Re Lee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API