Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Celfan Building Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

Defendant moves to preclude plaintiff from giving any evidence on the trial of this action pertaining to those items of defendant’s demand as to which particulars have not been furnished by plaintiff’s bill of particulars.

The instant equity action is brought by the tenant of a stationery store to enforce a negative covenant in the lease, whereby the landlord had agreed “ not to allow any other tenant to sell or offer for sale,” among other things, such an item as “ soda.” The complaint alleges that shortly after plaintiff purchased the stationery business and the accompanying lease a grocery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Humphrey v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of ErnstNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  4. Supreme Finance Corp. v. Burnee Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933
  5. Tomasino v. Prudential Westchester Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PNY Realty Corp. v. Chong Leung RestaurantCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  2. Runals v. Niagara UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rogers v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API