Rogers v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis Gr. Bruhn, J.
This is a motion on behalf of the defendant for an order precluding the plaintiffs from presenting any evidence for which a bill of particulars has been demanded and has not been complied with.
Rule 115 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides in part:
“ (a) * * *. If the party upon whom such notice is served is unwilling to give such particulars, in whole or in part, he may move to vacate or modify such notice by serving his motion papers within five days after receipt thereof. * * ” If no such motion is made the bill of particulars shall be served within ten days after the demand therefor,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hersh v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Desimone v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Becker v. Paragon Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Curran v. PorkarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Peck v. Bandell, New York County Courts1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.