Legal Opinion

Tomasino v. Prudential Westchester Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for breach of a lease, appellant moved to preclude respondent from giving evidence on the trial because of respondent’s failure to serve a bill of particulars. The motion was granted, unless respondent served a hill of particulars within thirty days, except as to certain items which were disallowed. The appeal is from so much of the order as disallowed those items. Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph the words and figures “ except items 4-a, 4-c, 4-e, 4-f and 6-d, which are hereby disallowed.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Brogan Cadillac Oldsmobile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Tafoya v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Friedman v. Celfan Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bouton v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API