Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Ernst

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 18, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buscaglia, S.

This is a proceeding for the probate of an alleged will of August E. Ernst, deceased.

The contestants object to the probate and allege decedent’s testamentary incapacity, fraud, deceit and/or undue influence. The proponent now moves this court to strike out the objection of testamentary incapacity on the grounds that decedent’s competency was tried out by a court of competent jurisdiction, namely the Supreme Court of Erie County, wherein after a *238hearing was duly held, a jury returned a verdict on the 25th day of April, declaring the decedent competent to manage himself and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Clapp v. . FullertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Haverhill v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. In re SeagristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. People v. . McClellanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Celfan Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Runals v. Niagara UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Thompson v. ShevlinNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of ErnstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API