Braun v. Woollacott
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action against defendants as sureties on a bond executed by one A. J. Hewton for the faithful performance and accounting to plaintiffs by him as consignee of certain goods. Plaintiffs had judgment, and defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for new trial.
1. It is contended that the complaint does not state a cause of action because it fails to show that plaintiffs were copartners when the action was commenced, and is therefore fatally defective. (Citing Affierbach v. McGovern, 79 Cal. 268; Fredericks v. Tracy, 98 Cal. 658; Holly v. Heiskell, 112 Cal. 174.) The point…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Osment v. McelrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Affierbach v. McGovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Holly v. HeiskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Molen v. OrrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mervyn Investment Co. v. BiberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Payne v. Commercial National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- KDH Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HarveyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939