Mervyn Investment Co. v. Biber
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The appellant and one Carl Werner were associated in the business of conducting an apartment house in the city of San Francisco.
Werner held a ten years’ lease on the premises and had advanced money and incurred indebtedness for outfitting the apartments and otherwise financing the business. The appellant was operating the business and giving his entire time and attention to its management.
The business was conducted for some months under an oral agreement which was, on the 8th of March, 1913, reduced to writing and duly executed by the parties.
The agreement recites that: “Whereas, the parties…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crossen v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Miller v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- White v. Pecos Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Belch v. Big Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Boyd v. American Carbon Black Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Owen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Page v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.