United States v. Richard & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 40448. [Oral, argument Oct. 19,1917, by Mr. Mulvaney and Mr. Lane.]
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The importation here consists of what is known as spare or repair parts, in duplicate, of two 120-horsepower Diesel engines, one installed on the Moreno and the other on the Rivadavia, battleships built in this country for the Argentine Republic. These engines were built abroad and imported and entered separately from the parts in question. Each is designed and used to operate a dynamo to supply the vessel with electric light and power. They can not be used for propelling the ship, but the switchboard connected with each is so arranged that the power thereof can be used for operating the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. OuterbridgeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Chain CableU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1836
- Otte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Twenty-Three Coils of CordageDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1832
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. HannevigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Gibbs v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- United States v. Admiral Oriental LineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Gibbs v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- United States v. Harlan & Hollingsworth Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.