State of Minnesota v. Emile Rey
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUEHLBERG,Judge *
Appellant Emile .Rey challenges his obligation to pay restitution in the amount of $66,000, arguing that: the identity-theft statute, which authorized the district court to order restitution, violates his substantive and procedural due-process rights; the district court abused its discretion because it failed to consider his ability to pay restitution; and the restitution amounted to an unconstitutional fíne. We affirm.
FACTS
Rey pleaded' guilty to one count of identity theft involving more than eight direct victims. See Minn. Stat. § 609.527, subds. 2, 3(5) (2014).- He…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.