Legal Opinion

United States v. Weakley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2006No. Nos. 05-30125, 05-30164, 05-30145, 05-30167, 05-30165Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Defendants Jeffrey Weakley (‘Weakley”), Richard Flowers (“Flowers”), and Dorothy Flowers (“D.Flowers”) (collectively, “Defendants”) were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendants were initially sentenced in 2003, but we vacated the sentences and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Anderson, 94 Fed.Appx. 487 (9th Cir. 2004). Upon re-sentencing, the district court refused to make a factual determination as to tax loss and sentenced all three Defendants outside the advisory Sentencing Guidelines ranges, imposing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API