Legal Opinion

Mackintosh v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1997No. 27199PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*395OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants/Cross-Respondents Richard and Lynn Mackintosh (the Mackintoshes) bought a house from Respondent/Cross-Appellant California Federal Savings and Loan (Cal Fed), which owned the house by way of foreclosure. Cal Fed was aware that the basement of the house flooded severely during high water times, but because the sale was “as-is,” Cal Fed did not disclose this material defect to the Mackintoshes. Richard Mackintosh was told of the defect after the sale by a worker hired by Cal Fed and confirmed the worker’s information after talking to the prior owner of the house. The…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Star v. RabelloNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Shoen v. Amerco, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Building & Construction Trades Council of Northern Nevada v. State Ex Rel. Public Works BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Giles v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. American Heritage, Inc. v. Nevada Gold & Casino, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Boomer Development, LLC v. National Association of Home Builders of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Golden Pisces, Inc. v. Fred Wahl Marine Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API