Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, McCredie, J., entered' October 23, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for' personal injuries sustained by an employee in a mill.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This action was instituted by the respondent, the plaintiff below, to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained on January 17, 1908. From a verdict and judgment in his favor this appeal is prosecuted.
The case is entitled, “Daniel Hale, by his guardian ad litem, F. P. Wagner.” The complaint states that the plaintiff is a minor of the age of twenty years, but it does not allege the appointment of a guardian ad litem, and there was no evidence introduced on that subject. The evidence does show, however, that the respondent was a minor of the age of twenty years at the time of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonough v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Rothchild Bros. v. MahoneyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Blumauer v. ClockWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Shannon v. Consolidated Tiger & Poorman Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Hammarberg v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Swak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Hale v. City Cab, Carriage & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Sherman v. MobbsWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Kongsbach v. CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.