Kongsbach v. Casey
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 18, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action upon a bond of a contractor on public works.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
N. C. Kongsbach took a contract from T. F. Casey, principal contractor, for the painting of a school building in the city of Tacoma, Washington. Kongsbach having failed to pay plaintiffs the amounts claimed by them to be due for wages, this action was begun against the principal contractor and his surety, under the statute, Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1161. Tony Kongsbach claims $187 to be his due and Carroll Kongsbach demands $105. Defendant Casey in his answer made proffer of $149 to Tony Kongsbach, and $80 to Carroll Kongsbach. These tenders being refused, the money was paid into the registry of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blumauer v. ClockWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Nicholson v. Wilborn & McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Reid v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- In re Sanborn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- W. Harrison Price v. H. L. Coble Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Crowe & Co. v. Adkinson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Jahn & BressiWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- State Bank v. RutheWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.