Hale v. City Cab, Carriage & Transfer Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered January 21, 1911, granting a new trial, after a verdict in favor of the defendant, in an action for damages to an automobile through a collision with a runaway team.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Appeal from an order granting a new trial. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant, appellant here, and on motion of plaintiffs, respondents here, a new trial was granted. The motion assigned all of the statutory grounds excepting the sixth (Rem. & Bal. Code, § 399), and stated that it was based upon “the records and files herein and upon the affidavits hereinafter to be filed herein.” No affidavits were attached to or made a part of the motion as appears from the transcript. The order for new trial was entered January 21, 1911. It is couched in general terms.
The appellant contends…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rothchild Bros. v. MahoneyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Taylor v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- F. Chevalier & Co. v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Thompson-Spencer Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gallafent v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Stephens v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Turnbull v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Johnson v. PrinevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Thurman v. KildallWashington Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.