Legal Opinion

Hammarberg v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1898No. 2944PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior Oourt, Pierce County. — Hon. J. A. Williamsoh, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The appellant is engaged in operating a lumber mill in Pierce county. The respondent was in his employ in the capacity of day laborer. A day or two before the occurrence of tbe injury for which he claims damages, the respondent was put to work on a cut-off saw in the mill, where -he was working at the time the accident out of which the injury grew occurred. At the time the respondent went to work in the mill, millwrights were engaged in repairing some beams directly over the bench on which he was working. These beams were for the reception of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. MullinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  2. The Nord Deutscher Lloyd Steamship Co. v. IngebregstenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  3. Sadowski v. Michigan Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. McCarthy Dry Goods Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Shannon v. Consolidated Tiger & Poorman Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Jock v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Mullin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API