Rothchild Bros. v. Mahoney
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Okanogan county, Steiner, J., entered March 7, 1908, in favor of "the defendánt, upon dismissing an action on contract, for failure of proof.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
— This action, instituted by Rothchild Bros., a foreign corporation doing business in this state, for the recovery of the value of merchandise sold, was commenced prior to the taking effect of chapter 140, Session Laws of 1907. 'The complaint did not allege that the plaintiff had paid its *634annual license fee last due. The amended complaint and reply were served and filed after the act took effect, but neither of them made any allegation in reference to the payment or nonpayment of the license fee. Thereafter the case came on for trial, both parties submitting evidence, at the conclusion of…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Stephens v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- North Star Trading Co. v. Alaska-Yukon-Pacific ExpositionWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Eastman & Co. v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.