Cain v. Booth & Flinn, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Walling,
These two appeals are from judgments entered in the same case and will be considered together. On March 17, 1925, Isaac, the minor plaintiff, then seven years of age, lost his eyesight by the explosion of a dynamite cap, with which he was playing. This suit, brought against the defendants, Booth & Flinn, Ltd., on the contention that the dynamite cap came to his possession through their negligence, resulted in verdicts and judgments for the plaintiffs and defendants have appealed.
The defendants, from 1923 to 1925, inclusive, were engaged in the construction of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erbe v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Wolk v. Pittsburgh Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Fleccia v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Propert v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Mars v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- Fonzone v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Tomasak v. Boro. of CourtdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.