Legal Opinion

Tomasak v. Boro. of Courtdale

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1930No. Appeal 17 and 18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The defendant, the Borough of Courtdale, made some improvements in the highway. Mike Tomasak, aged thirteen years and nine months, picked up a dynamite cap in the immediate vicinity and proceeded to pound it with a stone; the cap exploded and inflicted upon him injuries which resulted in the serious impairment of the sight of one eye. The suit is brought by his parents on his behalf and in their own "right.

At the trial, after the plaintiffs had presented their case, the defendant moved for a non suit, alleging that the proofs did not agree with the pleadings.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Cain v. Booth & Flinn, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Zeher v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Campbell v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Levin v. Clad & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Raskus v. Allegheny Valley Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Taylor v. Di SandroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Parker v. Ryan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API