Legal Opinion

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Little

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 4, 1931No. 4561PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sur Motion for a New Trial.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff’s statement of claim alleges that, while crossing the street, she was negligently run down by the defendant’s electric motortruck. The negligence charged is, among other things, failure to control the course, speed, and direction of the truck, and failure to regard the rights of the plaintiff in the lawful use of the highways and to allow the plaintiff sufficient time to reach a place of safety. The defendant might have asked for a more specific statement, but did not. The defendant filed no…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Flanigan v. McLeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Gilles v. LeasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph Rodrigues v. Ripley Industries, Inc., Joseph Rodrigues v. Ripley Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. Baumann v. CantonDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1968
  3. Vinet v. Checker Cab CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Horton v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Kulp v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API