Legal Opinion

Porter v. Mobile Pulley & MacH. Works

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 22, 1987No. Civ. 5703PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the Rule 60(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, motion of claimant to set aside a judgment entered upon agreement in settlement of a workmen's compensation claim. We find no error, and affirm.

Claimant, Porter, entered into an agreement with his employer, Mobile Pulley Machine Works, to settle his claim for workmen's compensation benefits arising from an injury to his back. The executed written agreement was presented by petitioner to the circuit court for approval and entry of judgment. After examination of claimant as to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frazier v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Howell v. D.H. Holmes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Snowden v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Fabarc Steel Supply, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Brown v. Murray SEC. Guard Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. McArdle v. BromfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Branson MacHinery, 1100173 (Ala. 8-12-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Spriggs Enterprises v. FitkinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Ashley v. State Ex Rel. BrooksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API