Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 1998No. 1970426PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari review to consider the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which held that the trial court had acted within its discretion in ordering that a judgment approving a workers' compensation settlement agreement between Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Joseph P. Hines III be set aside under Rule 60(b)(6), Ala. R. Civ. P., to the extent the judgment barred Hines from pursuing a pending claim seeking damages for an alleged retaliatory discharge. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.Hines, 725 So.2d 275 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997). We reverse and remand.

Hines injured his right shoulder on January 5,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Insurance Mgt. & Admin. v. Palomar Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Raine v. First Western BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Osborn v. RocheSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Graben v. a & B Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Price v. ClaytonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. E.S.R. v. Madison County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API