Legal Opinion

McArdle v. Bromfield

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 1, 1989No. Civ. 6511-APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from (1) the denial of a Rule 60(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, motion for relief from a consent judgment and (2) the assessment of attorney fees pursuant to the Alabama Litigation Accountability Act (statute), Ala. Code (1975), § 12-19-270 et seq. (1986 Repl.Vol.).

Plaintiffs (Bromfields) and defendant-appellant McArdle entered into a settlement agreement concerning the existence and extent of a "road." After reviewing the terms of the agreement in open court, the circuit court entered a "judgment by agreement." Thereafter, McArdle filed a 60(b) motion for relief from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Porter v. Mobile Pulley & MacH. WorksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. McAnnally v. Levco, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Millican v. CantrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fox v. MurrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Tatum v. GoodeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Warner v. BullingtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Bebee Props., LLC v. ArdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  5. Lee-Davis v. Dauphin Surf Club Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API