Brown v. Murray SEC. Guard Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a denial of a rule 60 (b)(6), A.R.C.P., motion for relief from a consent settlement in a workmen's compensation case.
The dispositive issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff-employee's motion. We hold that it did and reverse.
The record reveals that the plaintiff, while within the line and scope of his employment, was injured in an automobile accident on May 12, 1972. In settlement of plaintiff's workmen's compensation claim, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a compromise agreement which was approved by the Circuit Court of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John Curtis Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Thomas v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Charles Townsend Ford, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Haskew v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fabarc Steel Supply, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Porter v. Mobile Pulley & MacH. WorksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Edward Wiggins Logging Co. v. WigginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- McCollough v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Keith v. MooneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.