County of Santa Clara v. Trump
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND TO DISMISS WITH REGARDS TO THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
William H. Orrick,.United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
The government has moved for reconsideration of my April 25, 2017 order enjoining section 9(a) of Executive Order 13768 (“PI Order”).1 It has also moved to dismiss the City and County of San Francisco’s and the County of Santa Clara’s *1206claims under Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(b)(1). The government’s motions rely heavily on Attorney General Sessions’s two page memorandum, (the “AG…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Chicago v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- City & Cnty. of S.F. v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- County of Santa Clara v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- (PC) Marti v. ManningDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PS) Machado v. LizarragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.