Legal Opinion
City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Sessions
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 5, 2018No. Case No. 17-cv-04642-WHO; Case No. 17-cv-04701-WHOPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William H. Orrick, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
In fiscal year 2017, defendants Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and the Department of Justice (collectively, the "DOJ") announced that applicants for federal grants under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant ("Byrne JAG") program would need to satisfy three new conditions for funding directed at state and local governments that have adopted so-called "sanctuary city" statutes and ordinances. The conditions require that grant recipients (i) provide the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- City of Philadelphia v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- City of Los Angeles v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- City of Los Angeles v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- City of S.F. v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.