Legal Opinion

County of Santa Clara v. Trump

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 20, 2017No. Case No. 17-cv-00574-WHO, Case No. 17-cv-00485-WHOPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

On April 25, 2017, I entered a preliminary injunction against Section 9(a) of Executive Order 13768, “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,”, 82 Fed. Reg. 8799 (Jan. 25, 2017) (the “Executive Order”). Preliminary Injunction Order (“PI Order”)(SF Dkt. No. 82), (SC Dkt. No. 98). I concluded that the County of Santa Clara and the City and County of San Francisco had pre-enforcement standing to protect hundreds of millions of dollars of federal grants from the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. City & Cnty. of S.F. v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. City of Phila. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. City of Los Angeles v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. City of S.F. v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API