Legal Opinion

(PC) Marti v. Manning

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 5, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01829Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEX LAMOTA MARTI, No. 2:21-cv-01829 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 TODD MANNING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. On November 13, 2024, the undersigned granted in part and denied in part plaintiff’s 19 motion to compel (ECF No. 37) and ordered defendants to submit responsive grievances and 20 appeals to the court for in camera review (ECF No. 89). Having completed the review, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
Sanchez v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.