Legal Opinion

Cain v. Quannah Light & Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1928No. 18079PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

This is an action originally brought in the district court of Oklahoma county by Frances Cain, widow of C. II. Cain, deceased, in her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, against the Quannah Light & Ice Company, to recover damages because of the death of her husband. The Hartford Accident '& Indemnity Company was also made a party plaintiff.

The deceased met his death at Eldorado, July 6, 1923, while engaged as an employee of the United States Gypsum Company, in pulling a switch to cut off the electric current at a transformer and substation owned and operated by the said…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Dallas Hotel Co. v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Sessions v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Miller v. F. Beck & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. A.A.R. Western Skyways, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API