Legal Opinion
McFarland v. Heady
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
123 Cal.App.2d Supp. 973 (1954)
LOREN H. McFARLAND, Respondent,
v.
LeROY F. HEADY, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Feb. 24, 1954.
Frank Marvin and Harold V. Thompson for Appellant.
Stutsman, Hackett & Nagel for Respondent.
CONLEY, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment for $2,500 awarded the plaintiff real estate broker for alleged services rendered by him in procuring a contract for the exchange of Fresno County property consisting of a motel.
The exchange was never, in fact, consummated because a condition understood, and stipulated to, by all of the interested parties was never fulfilled.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colton v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Ball v. California Conserving Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- McAdoo v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Leipsic v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Barrios v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Diamond v. HaydisArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Phillips v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Krebs v. MorganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Morgan v. GolderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968