Legal Opinion

McAdoo v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1924No. Docket No. 4990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of Lilienthal-Williams Company, brokers, brought this action to recover from the defendant certain commissions claimed to be due said brokers for services rendered by them in negotiating contracts of sale of merchandise, in which the defendant was the seller.

The complaint contained two causes of action, but the plaintiff dismissed the first cause of action and recovered judgment upon the second count.

There is no dispute about the facts, many of them being covered by stipulation of the parties. It was stipulated that Lilienthal-'Wo.lliams Company was employed as broker…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ball v. California Conserving Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Diamond v. HaydisArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Blaine v. StingerArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Phillips v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Barrios v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API